Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Appellate
-
September 04, 2025
Doc Tells 1st Circ. Acquitted Conduct Marred Drug Sentence
A Massachusetts psychiatrist convicted over an alleged scheme to import and dispense nonapproved forms of addiction medication on Thursday told the First Circuit the trial judge wrongly ran afoul of limitations on the consideration of acquitted conduct in federal sentencings when handing him a three-year prison term.
-
September 04, 2025
10th Circ. Ends Huffing Death Product Liability Suit
The Tenth Circuit refused to revive a Kansas man's proposed class action seeking damages against the makers of canned compressed air after his adult son fatally inhaled their product, saying the manufacturers can't be held liable because intentionally huffing the toxic gases in the product is against state law.
-
September 04, 2025
Calif. High Court Nixes Death Sentence Over Gang Law Shift
The California Supreme Court on Thursday reversed the convictions of a prisoner on Death Row, saying developments in legislation and case law defining gang involvement have invalidated his death sentence.
-
September 04, 2025
Door Maker Asks 4th Circ. To Kill Landmark Divestiture Order
Door maker Jeld-Wen is accusing a rival who convinced a court to order a landmark divestiture as part of its antitrust case of moving the goalposts now that it's out of hot water, telling a Fourth Circuit that the forced sale is no longer necessary.
-
September 04, 2025
Ill. Court Says Employer Immunity Bars Shovel Attack Suit
An Illinois appellate court has upheld the dismissal of a suit seeking to hold an employer liable for injuries suffered by a worker whose coworker repeatedly hit him on the head with a shovel, saying the claims are barred by the state's workers' compensation statute.
-
September 04, 2025
Feds Stand By $10M Medicare Fraud Conviction At 4th Circ.
The Fourth Circuit should uphold the six-year sentence of a physician assistant who was found guilty of Medicare fraud after prosecutors said he rubber-stamped bogus prescriptions for genetic testing worth about $10 million, the government told the court.
-
September 04, 2025
Chevron, Exxon Kick Off High Court La. Pollution Case
Chevron and Exxon Mobil Corp. on Thursday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the Fifth Circuit's ruling that Louisiana state court, not federal court, is the proper venue for claims that their World War II-era oil production activities violated state law.
-
September 04, 2025
Yale Hospital's Info Request Upheld In $435M Property Suit
Three third-party hospital real estate holding companies and their corporate parent cannot challenge a decision requiring them to give records to Yale New Haven Health Services Corp. for its $435 million asset sale dispute with bankrupt Prospect Medical Holdings Inc., a Connecticut appeals court has ruled.
-
September 04, 2025
Conn. Justices Don't Create Notice Duty For Insurance Agents
An insurance agency had no duty to tell a Connecticut couple that their homeowners' policy was at risk of nonrenewal before an accidental fire destroyed their house, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Thursday, affirming that it is a carrier's job to try to notify policyholders when continuation of coverage is on the line.
-
September 04, 2025
Ga. Panel Weighs Tolling Issue In Archdiocese Abuse Cases
An attorney urged the Georgia Court of Appeals on Thursday to overturn a trial court order freeing the Archdiocese of Atlanta, the city's current and former archbishops and a number of parish churches from a set of consolidated cases related to sexual abuse that allegedly took place from the 1960s through the 1980s.
-
September 04, 2025
Texas Prosecutor's Race Remarks Endanger Murder Sentence
A Texas prosecutor "went too far" by telling jurors in a punishment trial that the defendant murdered his victim because he was prejudiced against Hispanic people, the state's highest criminal court has ruled, ordering a lower court to assess whether that comment could have led to a harsher sentence.
-
September 04, 2025
4th Circ. Affirms Gardasil's Vaccine Table Inclusion
A unanimous Fourth Circuit panel affirmed Thursday that adding the human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil to the Vaccine Act's injury table did not violate the U.S. Constitution, rejecting three plaintiffs' arguments that the Secretary of Health and Human Services lacks the authority to make additions to the table without an act of Congress.
-
September 04, 2025
Generic Drug Org Backs MSN In High Court Entresto Appeal
The Association for Accessible Medicines has thrown its weight behind MSN Pharmaceuticals in the company's U.S. Supreme Court challenge to a Federal Circuit decision blocking its generic version of Novartis' blockbuster cardiovascular drug Entresto, saying Wednesday that the appeals court took the wrong approach to patent validity.
-
September 04, 2025
Court Revives Hertz's Claims Against AAA Over Untowed Car
A Florida appeals court on Wednesday revived Hertz's third-party claims against the American Automobile Association over a rental car left untowed on a Miami causeway, ruling that a previous decision barring an injured driver's negligence suit does not eclipse Hertz's contract claims.
-
September 04, 2025
Enbridge Asks High Court To Reverse Pipeline Remand Ruling
Enbridge Energy has pushed the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a Sixth Circuit decision saying the company missed a deadline to transfer to federal court a suit by Michigan's attorney general seeking to block a pipeline, arguing the attorney general failed to show the removal process was untimely.
-
September 04, 2025
Justices Asked To Block FTC Commissioner Reinstatement
The Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to block the reinstatement of Democratic Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter while it appeals a ruling that found her firing was illegal, and also asked the high court to take up the case.
-
September 04, 2025
Ga. Officer Beats Tornado Failure To Warn Claims, Panel Says
A Georgia sheriff's office lieutenant can't be held liable for a family's death and injuries in a tornado after she failed to activate the county's warning siren system, a state appellate court said Thursday, ruling that her duties extended only to the public in a general sense rather than to individuals.
-
September 04, 2025
NC Panel Reopens 13 Asbestos Cases Against Tire-Maker
A split panel in a North Carolina state appeals court has revived more than a dozen workers' compensation cases linked to alleged asbestos exposure at a Continental Tire factory, finding the individual claimants are not bound by the results of bellwether cases.
-
September 04, 2025
10th Circ. Backs Firearms Ban For Those Under Indictment
The Tenth Circuit has upheld a ban on receiving firearms while under federal criminal indictment, finding a Utah man did not have his rights violated under the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Bruen decision.
-
September 04, 2025
5th Circ. Seems Open To United Workers' COVID Vax Class
The Fifth Circuit wrestled Thursday with allowing a group of United Airlines employees to pursue classwide claims that they were illegally forced to take unpaid leave after seeking exemptions from the company's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, with two judges appearing receptive to letting a certification order stand.
-
September 04, 2025
Ex-Law Firm Worker Fights $500K Judgment In Fraud Suit
The former office manager for a Detroit civil rights firm asked Michigan appellate judges to throw out a $500,000 judgment for the firm for admittedly using its money for her personal purchases, arguing the damages improperly included costs the firm said it incurred investigating the fraud.
-
September 04, 2025
NY AG Appeals Toss Of $500M Trump Fine In Civil Fraud Case
New York's attorney general said Thursday she will challenge an appeals court's decision to throw out what it called an "excessive" $489 million civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump and his sons, his companies, and executives of his companies.
-
September 04, 2025
Why The Harvard Funding Case Is 'Clear As Mud' On Appeal
A sweeping Harvard University victory in a suit challenging President Donald Trump's block on $2.2 billion in grant funding tees up a high-stakes appeal that experts say may turn on a wonky jurisdictional issue on which the U.S. Supreme Court seems to lack any sort of consensus.
-
September 04, 2025
Sterne Kessler Adds Ex-Deputy Chief PTAB Judge
The former acting head of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's unit that reexamines patents after they have been granted has made the move to Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox PLLC, amid a series of personnel changes at the agency.
-
September 04, 2025
'Tone Matters,' Justice Kavanaugh Tells Fellow Judges
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the judiciary should recommit to using cool-headed and civil language in their writing and spoke about the difficulties the court faces in handling a flood of emergency relief cases at a conference Thursday.
Expert Analysis
-
Opinion
The Legal Education Status Quo Is No Longer Tenable
As underscored by the fallout from California’s February bar exam, legal education and licensure are tethered to outdated systems, and the industry must implement several key reforms to remain relevant and responsive to 21st century legal needs, says Matthew Nehmer at The Colleges of Law.
-
2nd Circ. Reinforces Consensus On Vacating Foreign Awards
In Molecular Dynamics v. Spectrum Dynamics Medical, the Second Circuit recently affirmed that federal district courts do not possess subject matter jurisdiction to vacate foreign arbitral awards, strengthening this consensus across the circuits most active in recognition and enforcement actions, says Ed Mullins at Reed Smith.
-
What Dismissal Rulings May Mean For ERISA Forfeiture Cases
Following an influx of Employee Retirement Income Security Act class actions challenging the long-standing practice of plan sponsors using plan forfeitures to offset employer contributions, recent motion to dismiss rulings and a U.S. Department of Labor amicus brief may encourage more courts to reject plaintiffs' forfeiture theories, say attorneys at Mayer Brown.
-
Justices' Age Verification Ruling May Lead To More State Laws
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton ruling, permitting a Texas law requiring certain websites to verify users’ ages, significantly expands states' ability to regulate minors’ social media access, further complicating the patchwork of internet privacy laws, say attorneys at Troutman.
-
E-Discovery Quarterly: Rulings On Relevance Redactions
In recent cases addressing redactions that parties sought to apply based on the relevance of information — as opposed to considerations of privilege — courts have generally limited a party’s ability to withhold nonresponsive or irrelevant material, providing a few lessons for discovery strategy, say attorneys at Sidley.
-
Opinion
Section 1983 Has Promise After End Of Nationwide Injunctions
After the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down the practice of nationwide injunctions in Trump v. Casa, Section 1983 civil rights suits can provide a better pathway to hold the government accountable — but this will require reforms to qualified immunity, says Marc Levin at the Council on Criminal Justice.
-
Reel Justice: 'Oh, Hi!' Teaches Attys To Return To The Statute
The new dark comedy film “Oh, Hi!” — depicting a romantic vacation that turns into an inadvertent kidnapping — should remind criminal practitioners to always reread the statute to avoid assumptions, meet their ethical duties and finesse their trial strategy, says Veronica Finkelstein at Wilmington University School of Law.
-
Patent Ambiguity Persists After Justices Nix Eligibility Appeal
The Supreme Court recently declined to revisit the contentious framework governing patent eligibility by denying certiorari in Audio Evolution Diagnostics v. U.S., suggesting a necessary recalibration of both patent application and litigation strategies, say attorneys at Skadden.
-
Justices' Decision Axing Retiree's ADA Claim Offers Clarity
The U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Stanley v. City of Sanford that protections under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act don't extend to retirees potentially limits liability by giving employers additional support to challenge complaints, and highlights the need for proactive policy management to mitigate risk, say attorneys at Jackson Lewis.
-
Fed. Circ. In June: Transitional Phrases In Patent Claims
The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Eye Therapies v. Slayback Pharma takes on the rarely addressed topic of transitional phrases in patent claims, providing some useful lessons regarding restating claim language and broadly distinguishing prior art, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.
-
Series
Playing Soccer Makes Me A Better Lawyer
Soccer has become a key contributor to how I approach my work, and the lessons I’ve learned on the pitch about leadership, adaptability, resilience and communication make me better at what I do every day in my legal career, says Whitney O’Byrne at MoFo.
-
What To Do When Congress And DOJ Both Come Knocking
As recently seen in the news, clients may find themselves facing parallel U.S. Department of Justice and congressional investigations, requiring a comprehensive response that considers the different challenges posed by each, say attorneys at Friedman Kaplan.
-
Series
Law School's Missed Lessons: Learning From Failure
While law school often focuses on the importance of precision, correctness and perfection, mistakes are inevitable in real-world practice — but failure is not the opposite of progress, and real talent comes from the ability to recover, rethink and reshape, says Brooke Pauley at Tucker Ellis.
-
Eye Drop Ruling Clarifies Importance Of Patent Phrasing
The Federal Circuit's recent ruling in Eye Therapies v. Slayback, rejecting the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's interpretation of "consisting essentially of," highlights the importance of using clear and consistent terms throughout a patent's filing history to shield it against future challenges, says Liliana Di Nola-Baron at Panitch Schwarze.
-
Midyear Rewind: How Courts Are Reshaping VPPA Standards
The first half of 2025 saw a series of cases interpreting the Video Privacy Protection Act as applied to website tracking technologies, including three appellate rulings deepening circuit splits on what qualifies as personally identifiable information and who qualifies as a consumer under the statute, say attorneys at Perkins Coie.